A new PAC is trying to turn conspiracy thinking into political capital.
That matters because endorsing candidates who repeat antisemitic lies does more than scandalize the race. It helps move fringe propaganda closer to the center of public debate.
The Times of Israel reports that AZAPAC, a new U.S. anti-Zionist political action committee, is endorsing candidates who believe Jews were behind 9/11. The group was founded by a self-described libertarian who recently called Israel the “synagogue of Satan,” and it is trying to carve out its own lane even as it overlaps with other pro-Palestinian PACs. The point is not just to support candidates. It is to bless a set of beliefs that traffic in old antisemitic myths.
The core mechanism here is message laundering: extreme claims are being wrapped in political endorsement so they can sound less poisonous and more acceptable. That is a narrative fight, not a policy fight. The damage comes from normalizing a false story about Jews and power, which is exactly how propaganda spreads.
Jews are the direct target because the underlying claim revives a classic antisemitic conspiracy. Voters are also affected because endorsing candidates based on hate-driven nonsense lowers the quality of the public conversation. Anyone trying to track real positions on Israel, Palestine, or U.S. foreign policy gets buried under noise and provocation.
Watch whether candidates or allied groups distance themselves or double down.
Watch whether the PAC’s language gets repeated by larger political players looking for a fight.
Watch whether reporters and platforms label the claims as antisemitic conspiracy propaganda or let them drift as ordinary partisan messaging.